Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Sunday, May 11
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    BRICS+ News
    Subscribe
    • BRICS+ News
    • Brazil
    • Russia
    • India
    • China
    • South Africa
    • Egypt
    • Ethiopia
    • Iran
    • United Arab Emirates
    • Saudi Arabia
    BRICS+ News
    Home»China»Philippines Strengthens Maritime Claims Using Legal Channels Against China’s Advances
    China

    Philippines Strengthens Maritime Claims Using Legal Channels Against China’s Advances

    BRICS+ News ServicesBy BRICS+ News ServicesAugust 7, 2024No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Philippines Strengthens Maritime Claims Against China Using International Law

    In a significant move to assert its territorial claims in the South China Sea, the Philippines is increasingly turning to international maritime law. The nation aims to counter China’s expansive sovereignty claims over the region, which have been a point of contention for years. This development underscores the escalating maritime disputes and the strategic maneuvers by regional players to bolster their positions.

    The Dispute’s Background

    The South China Sea is one of the world’s most contested areas, with several countries, including China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei, claiming parts of its waters. The area is rich in natural resources and holds strategic military significance, making it a hotbed for geopolitical tensions. China’s sweeping claims, encapsulated in the so-called "nine-dash line," have often brought it into direct conflict with its neighbors.

    Legal Maneuvers by the Philippines

    To strengthen its claims, the Philippines has invoked the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This international treaty, which the Philippines and China have ratified, provides a legal framework for maritime disputes. In 2016, the Philippines won a landmark case at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, which invalidated China’s extensive claims under the nine-dash line. However, China has refused to recognize the ruling, leading to ongoing tensions.

    Recent Developments

    The latest actions by the Philippines signify a proactive approach to defending its maritime sovereignty. This includes filing new diplomatic protests against China’s activities within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and publicizing instances of Chinese vessels encroaching upon its territories. These steps are part of a broader strategy that leverages legal avenues and international support to push back against Chinese assertiveness.

    International Implications

    The escalating friction in the South China Sea has drawn global attention. The United States has frequently conducted "freedom of navigation" operations to challenge China’s claims and support its allies in the region. Meanwhile, ASEAN countries are continuously navigating a complex web of diplomacy and defense strategies to protect their interests.

    The Role of ASEAN and Global Powers

    Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) members have varied responses to the tensions, often balancing between economic ties with China and security concerns. The international community, especially powers like the United States, Japan, and Australia, has also emphasized the importance of a rules-based order in the region, advocating for peaceful resolution through legal means.

    Looking Ahead

    As the dispute progresses, the Philippines’ reliance on maritime law highlights the importance of legal tools in international relations. By focusing on rules-based frameworks, the Philippines not only reinforces its territorial claims but also sets a precedent for other nations facing similar challenges.

    China’s maritime ambitions and its interactions with its neighbors will likely remain a key issue in the geopolitical landscape. The Philippines, through its legal strategies, continues to underscore the relevance of international law in maintaining regional stability and upholding sovereign rights in contested waters.

    For more information on the geopolitical dynamics of the South China Sea dispute and other related developments, visit the South China Morning Post website.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    BRICS+ News Services
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Navigating US-China Relations: Barriers to a Bilateral Agreement

    October 26, 2024

    BRICS Accelerates Efforts to Reshape Global Power Dynamics

    October 26, 2024

    Revolutionizing Roads: How Chinese Smartphone Giants are Driving the Electric Vehicle Industry Forward

    October 26, 2024
    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    CurrencyPrice
    UAE Dirham 
    UAE Dirham
    3.673
    Brazilian Real 
    Brazilian Real
    5.6485down
    Chinese Yuan (offshore) 
    Chinese Yuan (offshore)
    7.2405
    Egyptian Pound 
    Egyptian Pound
    50.5812down
    Ethiopian Birr 
    Ethiopian Birr
    134.6069
    Indian Rupee 
    Indian Rupee
    85.4129up
    Iranian Rial 
    Iranian Rial
    42,250
    Russian Ruble 
    Russian Ruble
    82.4553down
    Saudi Riyal 
    Saudi Riyal
    3.751
    South African Rand 
    South African Rand
    18.2248up
    US Dollar 
    US Dollar
    1
    11 May · FX Source: CurrencyRate 
    CurrencyRate.Today
    Check: 11 May 2025 21:05 UTC
    Latest change: 11 May 2025 21:00 UTC
    API: CurrencyRate
    Disclaimers. This plugin or website cannot guarantee the accuracy of the exchange rates displayed. You should confirm current rates before making any transactions that could be affected by changes in the exchange rates.
    ⚡You can install this WP plugin on your website from the official WordPress website: Exchange Rates🚀
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo YouTube
    • Brazil
    • Russia
    • India
    • China
    • South Africa
    • Egypt
    • Ethiopia
    • Iran
    • UAE
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    © 2025 Brics-Plus. Designed by Sujon. This site is by BRICS+ News Service, and is not affiliated with the BRICS+ group/alliance.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.